Considering that the numbers of online viewers of audiovisual contents multiply, at least, ten times the number of movie theatres audiences in each and every country, is it fair to have the State (which should represent the interests of the people) subsidise film productions with a non-negotiable condition that the films shall be presented and released in movie theatres?
Why do you insist to impose criteria that are not up-to-date with the public’s interests ignoring their own culture consumption habits?
While audiovisual works available for free to all users are ignored by the public authorities and denied subsidies while audiovisual works intended for theatre or TV releases which constitute under all lights the construction of private propriety (copyright and commercial exploitation) with public funds- continues to be hailed by the state cultural authorities as the only valid option. Don’t you plan to revaluate this unfair situation and leverage to the real world situation of the cultural consumers of your respective countries introducing a fair system of public subsidies?
November 5, 2009
Categories: Film/Media, Internet . Tags: actors, Ancine, Argentina, audiovisual, authorities, Brasil, Brazil, Chile, CNC, Colombia, content, Cultura, directors, download, entertainment, Europe, European States, film, filmmakers, France, Freedom Lab, INCAA, Latin American, México, Portugal, producers, Spain, subsidies, subsidy, subvenciones, subventions, UK . Author: Luis Anderson . Comments: Leave a Comment